The Washington Report

August 14, 2023

In This Issue

Government-Sponsored Enterprises Guarantee Fees (G-fees)
NAR Responds to FHFA's Request for Input on Upfront Fees

Rental Housing Issues
NAR Responds to FHFA on Rental Housing Policy

 

Government-Sponsored Enterprises Guarantee Fees (G-fees)


NAR Responds to FHFA's Request for Input on Upfront Fees

NAR submitted comments to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) regarding its request for input (RFI) on how it should set the upfront fees charged by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, also referred to as loan level pricing adjustments (LLPAs).

In the comment letter, NAR argues that:

  • The government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are finally achieving utility returns, but for the wrong reasons.
  • The capital rule imposed on the GSEs is too high and not related to risk.
  • The GSEs should not set prices but a floor and ceiling for investor returns and allow the companies to set prices.
  • This exercise should be extended to create a price-setting framework that will work outside of conservatorship and analyze the impact of an explicit government guarantee.

Ken Fears, kfears@nar.realtor, 202-383-1066
Matt Emery, MEmery@nar.realtor, 202-383-1212

back to top

 

Rental Housing Issues


NAR Responds to FHFA on Rental Housing Policy

On Monday, July 31, NAR submitted its response to the Federal Housing Finance Agency’s (FHFA) Request for Information (RFI) on tenant protections in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac-backed multifamily rental properties.  This is in addition to a coalition comment letter that NAR joined with other housing provider groups, including the National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) and the National Apartment Association (NAA) in response to the same RFI. The RFI is a continuation of the Administration’s “Blueprint for a Tenant’s Bill of Rights,” a project announced in January in which the White House and federal agencies are examining existing rental housing policies.  NAR previously provided comments on an RFI about tenant screening practices to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 

The RFI asked about a range of tenant protections in GSE-backed multifamily properties, including eviction practices, rent increases, and notice requirements.  NAR stressed in its response the need for policies which address the root causes of high rents, including removing barriers to constructing new affordable housing, incentivizing participation in the Housing Choice Voucher program, and funding existing HUD programs.  NAR also highlighted the dangers of further regulation on GSE-backed properties, which comprise an estimated 26% of the multifamily rental market in the U.S.  Rental housing policies are the purview of state and local governments, which are closest to the needs of their communities.  An additional layer of federal regulations will only serve to create confusion among housing providers, lenders, and renters.  Further, policies such as rent control are not solutions to high rents and low inventory, but rather reduce property values, disincentivize new development, and favor current residents over future ones.  This so-called “solution” would actually make rental housing more scarce and ultimately more expensive. 

As the Administration continues to examine rental housing policies, NAR will continue to provide information and feedback stressing commonsense solutions that speak to the heart of the issue – our housing supply and inventory shortage – while advocating for private property rights and housing providers everywhere. 

Read NAR's response to the FHFA RFI. 

Read the coalition response to the FHFA RFI. 

For more on rental housing issues, visit the NAR Rental Housing page.

Erin Stackley, estackley@nar.realtor, 202-383-1150

back to top